Options table

Lay these options out against these criteria.

Decision: WHAT IS BEING DECIDED, and by when.
Options: LIST.
Criteria that matter: LIST, in rough order of importance.
What I know: ANY FACTS, COSTS, DATES OR CONSTRAINTS.

The table: options as rows, criteria as columns.

Every cell carries two things: the assessment, and its basis. Basis is
STATED if it came from what I gave you, INFERRED if you reasoned it
from something I gave you, or UNKNOWN. Do not fill an UNKNOWN cell with
a plausible value, and do not quietly drop a criterion because the
table is thin there. A column full of UNKNOWN is the most useful thing
this table can show me.

Then four short sections.

What would change the answer. The one or two facts that, if known,
would shift the choice. Ordered by how cheap they are to find out.
Not comparable. Where a criterion means something different for
different options, so the column is misleading.
Reversibility. For each option, how hard it is to undo and roughly how
long you would have to notice.
The option not on my list. If there is an obvious one I did not name,
including doing nothing for now, add it as a row and say why.

Do not recommend one. Do not score or weight them into a total. A
single number hides exactly the judgement I am here to make.